Top 5 Coding Mistakes Made by Startups

Top 5 Coding Mistakes Made By Startups
Post Menu and Details.

Words: 999

Reading time: ~4 minutes

Coding Mistakes

In any job, one has to face unpredictable difficulties that cannot be forecasted, but which must be overcome. Everyone makes mistakes, including the most experienced programmers. This is the only way to find the most profitable ways to solve various problems, to improve and grow in a professional sense.

If problems appear on a regular basis, a specialist will find ways to solve them. Absolutely all problems can be solved, as the practical work of programmers proves. Over time, problems become predictable, and an algorithm of actions is developed to eliminate them. Although they still continue to take up the energy and time of the worker. To minimize the risks for your business, it is worth ordering software development services for startups. This will simplify the work and, of course, will significantly save time resources.

The most common mistakes of programmers

So that the programmer does not have to waste time on solving the problems that have arisen, they should not be allowed. To do this, they analyze in advance all the risks and possible problems. Although force majeure happens when you don’t expect them. If possible, errors can be prevented by studying the most common problems of programmers made by startups, and these are:

  1. The programmer made a mistake in estimating the amount of work, and now he must ask for extensions. Usually, such errors arise from specialists who incorrectly assess the size of future work, the scale of the project as a whole. In this case, the employee focuses on the most profitable scenario for completing the task, but at the same time he does not think through the risks and difficulties in advance. A mistake can be made by both the project manager and inaccurate programming output. The result will be a constant flow of new tasks and requirements to the employee from the employer or customer.
  2. The wrong choice of technology, as a result of which the final product suffers. It is clear that technologies are changing rapidly today and it is very difficult to keep track of them. There are two ways: a programmer can start working without the required amount of skills and knowledge, or, on the contrary, he spends an excessive amount of time learning new technologies and methods. In the first case, the product will not be of high quality, in the second – the terms of its development will be quite long.
  3. One programmer wrote the code, and for the second one, it is completely incomprehensible. This happens when two, three or a whole development team have to work on one project. For the most part, programming is an improvement of existing programs or their complete change. Interestingly, all known codes were created by people from different parts of the world who have never met in person. Most of these projects are accompanied by a minimum number of documents, and they also do not have reviews, comments, recommendations. The function of help is not well thought out in them. The main problem, in this case, is the trivial fear of the programmer of the unknown code due to lack of experience or professionalism.
  4. A new programmer appears in the company, who becomes the head and demands to redo everything from scratch. Usually, a whole team of programmers is working on one project at once. This is teamwork, which means that all employees must understand each other and be able to interact with each other. New project participants are not yet part of this chain, and it is difficult for them to understand other workers. Criticism of such people is not justified and often slows down the solution of the problem.
  5. The programmer is delaying the time of submitting the work, as he needs additional time to fix problems, although the system does not detect them. The specialist strives to create an ideal product that is efficient to use and easy to maintain. This would help prevent new errors. To solve this problem, it is better to do the processing slowly but productively.

By contacting a software product development company, you can get quality services and assistance with programming.

What Makes a Good Software Engineer?

What Makes A Good Software Engineer

Thinking Beyond the Code

A good software engineer thinks beyond the code. In addition to considering the software users, they consider the potential impact their decisions will have on the team, the company, and the broader world around the app.

Could users experience downtime and outages after migrating to a new database?

Are global variables hamstringing our ability to deliver features in the future if we use them today to get something done quickly?

How do we handle the information that we’re storing that is personally identifiable and sensitive?

Good software engineers ask themselves questions like these.

Communication Skills

Development skills are directly correlated with good communication skills. Great programmers can understand problems clearly, present hypotheses, and develop coherent solutions. It’s unnecessary to write down everything in specifications since they understand concepts quickly or ask the right questions to make them clear. Offshore developers with great language fluency and a great understanding of English documentation tend to master multiple languages. Most developer interactions and documentation in the tech world are written in English.

Time Management

The best programmers are highly reliable. They show up on time to meetings and have a strong work ethic. Estimating how long it will take to complete a task, communicating this estimation, and delivering on it are important skills. Instead of you managing them, exceptional developers manage their clients or leaders.

Looks at the Bigger Picture

Great programmers consider the broader impact their work has on the system and the user experience as a whole rather than simply completing tasks. They want to make sure the feature they are developing is valuable, and they will speak up when a request could negatively impact another aspect or use of the software.


The unfortunate thing is that you often only discover halfway into the job that the programmer is not as good as they said they were. To avoid this, we recommend that you always get references from previous jobs.

Thank you for reading!

If you liked this post, check out these too: